RankLabPractice Questions →
AFH 1 · Chapter 16 · Section 16.19

Decision-Making Model

Part of Developing Ideas · 2 sections · ~891 words · WAPS PFE study material

📝 Practice 3,000+ WAPS questions on RankLab — free for E-5 and E-6 prep.
Try Free →

Decision-Making Model — Vroom-Yetton-Jago Levels I-III

Vroom-Yetton-Jago Foundation

V-Y-J Foundation
There are a wide range of decision-making models available for leaders, whether in the military or corporate structure.

Adopted by Military

V-Y-J Adopted
One decision-making model that has been adopted by the military is the Vroom-Yetton-Jago Decision-Making Model, used for deciding how to decide.

Five Primary Levels

5 V-Y-J Levels
According to this model, there are five primary levels of decision-making, each requiring a different level of involvement or complexity for the decision-making process.

Level I: Decide and Announce

Level I Definition
In this level, leaders make the decision and announce or present it to the group or organization.

Level I Pros

Level I Pros
This approach can allow leaders to make and implement decisions quickly, but to avoid possible indifference or lack of motivation, the leader controls the decision and the situation.

Level I Process

Level I Process
Leaders should explain rationale as to why the decision was made unilaterally.

Level I Cons

Level I Cons.
  • Leaders may not take the time to consider all the necessary information
  • By not including others in the decision-making process, leaders may alienate members of the group or organization unnecessarily

Level II: Gather Input from Individuals and Decide

Level II Definition
In this level, leaders gather input from selected individuals, or the group individually, and then make the decision.

Level II Pros

Level II Pros
This approach can allow leaders to:
  • Consult with recognized experts to gather additional information to make a more informed decision
  • Does not require a meeting with the entire group

Level II Cons

Level II Cons.
  • Others in the group may wonder why the leader did not consult with them
  • They may perceive the leader as playing favorites, which could result in some resistance from the group or organization when it comes time to implement the decision

Level III: Gather Input from the Group and Decide

Level III Definition
In this level, leaders gather input from the group and then make a decision.

Level III Pros

Level III Pros
This approach of including the group in gathering the data:
  • Enhances the chance for synergy
  • Better-informed decision-making

Level III Cons

Level III Cons
If a leader makes a decision different from what the group suggests:
  • The group may feel that their inputs or suggestions were not valued or appreciated
  • The group may feel that the decision-making process was predetermined by the leader and that the interaction was a façade
  • This will likely result in members of the group undermining implementation or being unwilling to participate in future decisions
Level III Time Cost
Also, this approach does take more time for the leader to make the decision.

Decision-Making Model — Vroom-Yetton-Jago Levels IV-V and Osborn-Parnes Integration

Level IV: Facilitate Consensus

Level IV Definition
In this level, leaders present issues or problems to the group and facilitate the decision-making process within the group.

Leader Fallback

Level IV Fallback
If the group is unable to reach consensus, the leader has the option to make the decision.

Level IV Pros

Level IV Pros
This approach of allowing the group to generate possible decision options:
  • Enhances buy-in and ownership of members of the group
  • Educates members of the group
  • Allows for quicker implementation as more people are knowledgeable about the decision process and what needs to be done
  • Helps build and sustain trust and respect between group members

Level IV Cons

Level IV Cons.
  • It takes more time
  • There is the possibility that the decision could be one that is adequate, but not optimal due to the nature of groups arriving at a compromise to reach an agreement
  • The leader needing to accept the decision or facilitate further decision analysis

Level V: Delegate with Constraints

Level V Definition
In this level, leaders delegate the problem to the group and authorize the group to make the decision within specified boundaries.

Leader Doesn't Abandon

Leader Doesn't Abandon
Leaders do NOT abandon the group but facilitate support and resources to enable the group's success in making a decision.

Level V Pros

Level V Pros.
  • Good for building team leadership skills
  • Allows ownership of the decision by the group
  • Frees the leader to focus on other issues

Level V Cons

Level V Cons.
  • It takes more time
  • It may lead to a decision not viewed by the leader as optimal
  • The team may not have the skills to reach a quality decision, resulting in disharmony among the group rather than pride in ownership over the decision

Osborn-Parnes Integration

Osborn-Parnes + V-Y-J
Note that the Osborn-Parnes process can be applied regardless of who provides input or makes the final decision.

Integration Examples

Integration Examples
For example:
  • Leaders can apply the Osborn-Parnes process to reach a decision independently (Level I: Decide and Announce)
  • They can involve others in Idea Finding only (Level I or II: Gather Input and Decide)
  • They can encourage others to apply the Osborn-Parnes process (Level IV or V: Facilitate Consensus or Delegate with Constraints)

Ready to test what you've learned?

RankLab has 3,000+ WAPS-style practice questions covering every AFH 1 chapter.

Start Free Practice →