Performance Evaluation Responsibilities

Evaluation Responsibilities

Unit Commanders

Unit commanders will ensure supervisors are properly trained and educated on how to write a performance evaluation.

Sex-Related Offense Reviews

Unit commanders must conduct a record review of all personnel assigned to and/or transferred into the command to ensure familiarization with the Airman's history of sex-related offenses resulting in conviction by courts-martial, non-judicial punishment, or other adverse administrative action.

This is accomplished to reduce the likelihood that repeat offenses will escape the notice of current, subsequent, or higher-level commanders.

Review of the record will be conducted by the immediate commander of the Airman at the lowest unit level. These responsibilities will not be delegated.

Raters, Reviewers, Senior Rater, and HLRs

Raters, reviewers, Senior Raters, and HLRs must consider the contents of:

Unfavorable Information Files
Personal Information Files

They must assess the ratee's:

Performance
What the ratee did
How well he or she did it
Potential based on that performance throughout the rating period

Ratees

Ratees must review evaluations prior to them becoming a matter of record. This is the time to bring typos, spelling errors, and inaccurate data to the attention of the rater.

What Signing Means

When the ratee signs the evaluation, he or she is not concurring with the content, but rather acknowledging receipt of the completed evaluation and certifying they have reviewed the evaluation for administrative errors.

If the ratee disagrees with any comments and/or ratings on the report, the ratee may file an appeal after the evaluation becomes a matter of record.

Evaluation Responsibilities

Unit Commanders

Raters, Reviewers, Senior Rater, and HLRs

Ratees

Ready to test what you've learned?